1440p vs 4k: Pros And Cons

1440p vs 4K

1440p vs 4K Pros And Cons

In the comparison 1440p vs 4K, we can define that 4K resolution is superior to 1440p (1) as it has more pixels (6) that are the objective measure to determine the technical difference under examination (4). With that said, we define that for certain user requirements (5) 1440p is the best option when we study the relationship between the costs and benefits (3), while 4K stands as the best option for some profiles of gamers, cinema, and television streaming as it fulfills better their user requirements (2).

In this 1440p vs 4K discussion, we will describe which is the best option for each type of user, as we describe below.

The resolution of a monitor is the amount of width and height in pixels (7). A 2560×1440 (1440P) resolution means the width is 2560 pixels and the height is 1440 pixels. And a 3860×2160 (4K) resolution means 3860 pixels width and 2160 pixels height (8).

We have studied 1080p resolution in this article. The older 720p resolution was analyzed in this article, along with its upscale to 1080p.

The 1440p monitor resolution is also known as QHD, WQHD, or Quad HD, while the 4K has alternative names like UHD, Ultra HD, or 2160P. These are two of the most popular resolutions in the industry. Where 4K is one of the latest resolution standards, the upgraded version is also introduced which is named 8K.

Pros Of 4K

More Screen Real Estate

4k pros: The screen real estate: the screen real estate is four times the amount of pixels than 1080p.

1080p and 1440p are the resolutions most widely adopted by everyone these days whether it be on TVs (for example Pioneer Kuro) or monitors for games. These resolutions yield great performance while looking decent. If you thought 1080p was sharp and plentiful, 4k is a fantastic experience to get into. If you are an editor or designer, screen real estate makes a big difference when it comes to workflow. You can fit much more in the screen, and you can multitask more efficiently.

This applies to users in all areas: YouTubers, office workers, and designers. 4k makes everything run smoother for you I guess. You could say it is a better user experience.

1440p vs 4K

Cons of 4K

However, despite all the positives of 4K, We have to analyze in detail many aspects.

Scaling Issues With Legacy Apps

1080p monitors at 24 inches have a great pixel density and it’s only slightly less than a 1440p monitor at 27 inches. Why is that important? Well, when you’re scaling one window to the next, it doesn’t really cause any issues when you go from 27 to 24 inches from the 1440p to 1080p however when you have a monitor that’s 27 inches and you go from 1080p to 1440p, and then to 4k you’re creating a ton of issues in your pixel density and it’s going to look visually bad on Windows especially with legacy applications that do not support the updated scaling standards.

If you want to have a 4k resolution monitor, you want it to be at least 32 inches pixel density. These values, make text completely unreadable without scaling a lot, with many other things such as icons and even entire webpages that are rendered unusable.

Even on my 40-inch display, I’ve had to set the scaling to 150% for it to be usable and this just doesn’t work for applications a lot of programs. Even games still will not scale, making menus and tasks pretty hard to utilize when we are trying to determine what you are clicking.

There is an issue with pixels per inch (PPI) and whereas Windows does such a good job of scaling, all the legacy apps in Windows do a terrible job of scaling. So it created a lot of issues from one program to the next one monitor to the next.

1440p vs 4K In Gaming

In 4K, screen real estate is great which makes it fantastic for editing and work tasks if you’re going to be doing it for those reasons 4k is worth it to you but who else would 4k appeal to? In 4k gaming of course.

At a glance, we can say that 4K is the best resolution for gaming. However, you will depend on very strong hardware (large monitor, strong graphics card, strong CPU, and high refresh rates) to withstand the requirements of gaming in 4K.

If you get a 4k display and you have intended to gaming on it you’re in for a real treat because 4k gaming is great as we already mentioned before you have to get a display that is big enough to reap the benefits of 4k gaming on a 40-inch display sitting close to it I can see the benefits and they are clear.

However, to drive that fidelity you need to have a piece of pretty powerful equipment, nothing less than GTX 1070.

A gamer will need 60 FPS minimum. It can be fine with 30 FPS. Anyway, if you have decided to utilize a 4K monitor, you would not want your PC gaming experience to be limited to 30 FPS no matter how good the visuals are.

So here is where we can see the shortcomings of 4k stand out. You need also a capable GPU, otherwise, be prepared to lose interest in modern titles as just you will not be able to run them on your 4k TV or monitor.

So if you want to edit and design efficiently and do work for the office, while also having access to a good gaming experience, then 1440p is the way to go.

Everyone preaches about 4k being the ultimate gaming experience but I’m still sitting here wondering why this is: 4k is not widely supported and 4k is still hard to run. There is not a huge amount of difference between 4k and 1440p anyway even with a larger screen, but above all, 1440p is a much better gaming experience all around.

I’m almost sure all users will prefer over a hundred FPS and 1440p, an already high resolution, more than 60 FPS at 4k.

Cases Where 4K Resolution Is Clearly The Best Option

Nevertheless, I can definitely recommend a 4k display over a 1440p in a few scenarios. One of those scenarios entails if you have a 4k gaming console if you want to watch 4k blu-ray or stream from sites such as Netflix or Amazon in 4k.

If you are in the United States or in the European Union and can watch 4k TV channels if you already have a 1440p 144 Hertz setup or more Hertz, or if you’re doing primarily work tasks like photo editing, 3d animation video, editing large Excel spreadsheets, etc. Apart from that, it’s not worth requiring a 4k resolution.

Conclusions: 1440p vs 4K: Which Is Better For You?

1440p is a better resolution rate overall. You can run games easier on it,  it still looks fantastic without having to get a huge TV that will occupy a large footprint in your desk, it’s still functional for editing and supports higher refresh rates.

Prices of 1440p displays are dropping very quickly now making them increasingly inexpensive. They are better for gaming due to them usually having a much faster response time and lower input latency, which is one of the most important things in competitive driven casual play.

These screen resolutions offer good graphics and efficient working abilities, but you need to consider the budget. When talking about gaming, then it becomes essential to consider a screen resolution that is important. It is because the resolution will not just affect the gameplay but would also play a significant role in selecting a perfect solution for PC.

If you use low range PCs primary graphics cards then you can select the 1080p monitors with the 60FPS rate. For users having mid-range devices with slightly enhanced versions of graphics, the 1080p combined with 120 to 144Hz monitor will be an ideal choice. Also, you can select the 1440p monitors or 4k displays, but they need a huge task to blend with the frame rate capacity of the screen.

1440P is referred to as Quad HD due to the four times more resolution than a 1280×720 HD resolution. While using a 27” monitor with a 1440P resolution, you will get an increased refresh rate as well as a perfect resolution for gaming. It is a more popular version today, as it is available at affordable prices for the consumers while providing powerful hardware. If you got the new RX480 graphics card from AMD, then you will even get virtual reality support in your display! If your monitor has a refresh rate of 60Hz, then 1440P will be an ideal resolution for you.

While the 4K is the whole new ball in the court. It is the latest and hottest resolution in the gaming world. It is an incredibly demanding thing and is the best for you if you have a compatible graphics card and no limit for the budget. You need a monitor with high refresh rates for supporting the 4K resolution. After testing, we see that the new GTX 1080 from NVIDIA has struggled for the 4K screen content. So, you need to really upgrade with some higher specifications if you are desperate of getting a 4K monitor.

Further Readings

We have some other interesting articles for you to read, we have selected our top articles below, and tried to keep this list short.

We have a technical vademecum where we discuss industry terminology and how it can be useful for you. Selected examples are the definition of PCM audio, then comes the comparison between PCM and Bitstream, the comparison between DTS Neo 2.5 and Dolby Digital, and the process to match amplifiers to speakers.

Also, we have reviewed some interesting DAC: The Elgar Plus from dCS, and the Schiit stack. where the Modi 3 behaves as an entry-level DAC.

In our reviews of AV receivers, we can recommend you to read some of our favorites, the ones that we liked the most, and trying to make the list short, we have the Denon AVR-X2500H, the Onkyo TX-NR686. We also have reviewed completely the Denon 8K receivers where we have studied the 8K Denon AVR-X2700H, the Denon AVC-X6700H, the AVC-X4700H, and the AVC-X3700H.

If you are into amplifiers, my favorite is the McIntosh MA9000, and that is why I would like to recommend you to read that review. My second favorite amplifier is the Mark Levinson 5805.

Regarding speakers, we have reviewed tiny bookshelf-speaker devices to large towers. My favorites were: the Devialet Gold, the Devialet Silver, the ProAc Response DT8, the Bowers and Wilkins 805 D3,

We do not review many headphones, but if you want a Sennheiser headphone for less than 100 dollars, we have this Sennheiser HD595 review.

We have some TV and monitor reviews and here we recommend the Samsung NU8000 (for gamers!) and my favorite is the review of the classical Pioneer Kuro.

Our home theater aficionados want to know everything about video definitions and configurations. So we studied 720p, how to scale it to 1080p the right way, and compared 1080p with 1440p and demonstrated why 1440p is not always better. Likewise, we had the urge to compare 1440k with 4K and try to find out how much are we gaining with the change.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here